LG 24G411A vs LG 24GS60F Comparison

The LG 24GS60F can display up to 180 frames per second, giving it a smoother feel than the 144Hz LG 24G411A when the graphics card produces sufficiently high frame rates. This advantage is most noticeable in shooters, racing games and other fast-moving titles. The 24G411A still feels responsive compared with a conventional 60Hz monitor, but competitive players are more likely to appreciate the extra headroom offered by the 24GS60F.

LG rates the 24GS60F at 300 nits, compared with 250 nits for the 24G411A, so it should remain more visible under bright room lighting. The 24G411A reverses the advantage in native contrast, with a listed 1500:1 ratio against 1000:1 on the 24GS60F. In practice, the newer model favours brightness, while the 24G411A may produce slightly deeper-looking blacks in dimmer environments.

Both monitors support AMD FreeSync and are listed as NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible, helping reduce tearing and stutter when game frame rates fluctuate. They also include Black Stabilizer, Crosshair, Dynamic Action Sync and an FPS counter. The LG 24G411A additionally lists Motion Blur Reduction and HDR Effect, while the 24GS60F focuses more heavily on its higher refresh rate and faster rated 1ms GtG response.

Their 23.8-inch Full HD IPS panels provide the same resolution, pixel density and 99% sRGB coverage, so neither offers a meaningful sharpness advantage. Both stands allow tilt adjustment only, with no height, swivel or pivot support. The 24GS60F has the lower listed average power consumption at 17W, while the 24G411A is slightly lighter without its stand and occupies less width on the desk.