Dell S2725DSM vs Benq GW2790QT
The clearest split between the Dell S2725DSM and the Benq GW2790QT is refresh rate. Dell S2725DSM runs at 144Hz versus 75Hz on the Benq GW2790QT. That gap is meaningful in fast-paced games — enemies move more smoothly, tracking feels more responsive, and the transition from 60fps to higher frame rates is clearly visible. For everyday desktop use and productivity, both feel identically fluid.
Buy the Dell S2725DSM if you need QHD (sharp, high-density display for detailed productiv).
- 350 cd/m² — brightness — better visibility in bright office environments
Buy the Benq GW2790QT if you need USB-C (USB-C — single-cable connection for modern laptops).
- Daisy-chain — DisplayPort MST out — chain multiple monitors from one cable
- QHD — sharp, high-density display for detailed productivity work
Dell S2725DSM
- Dell S2725DSM -- Refresh Rate: 144Hz (max) -- higher max Hz -- smoother motion, competitive advantage
- Dell S2725DSM -- Response Time: 4 ms (GtG)1 ms (MPRT) -- faster GtG response -- sharper motion, less ghosting
- Dell S2725DSM -- Pixel Density: 109 PPI -- sharper image -- more pixels per inch
- Dell S2725DSM -- Adaptive Sync: AMD FreeSync -- broader VRR support
Benq GW2790QT
- Benq GW2790QT -- Refresh Rate: 75Hz (max) -- lower max Hz -- less fluid gameplay
- Benq GW2790QT -- Response Time: 5 ms (GtG) -- slower GtG response -- more visible blur in fast scenes
- Benq GW2790QT -- Pixel Density: 108 PPI -- lower pixel density -- softer at close viewing distances
- Benq GW2790QT -- Adaptive Sync: -
- IPS panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction
- Anti-glare matte coating — effective reflections control for comfortable all-day use
- QHD resolution (2560 x 1440) — 78% more pixels than FHD for crisp, detailed visuals
- 144Hz refresh rate — significantly smoother motion than standard 60/75Hz displays
- 4.0 ms (GtG) — clean pixel transitions for everyday content and media
- 1 ms (MPRT) — sharper moving images with reduced perceived motion blur
- 350 cd/m² brightness — adequate luminance for typical indoor lighting conditions
- 99% sRGB — near-complete standard gamut for precise color work
- Variable refresh (AMD FreeSync) — eliminates tearing and stutter for smooth gaming
- 8-bit color panel — accurate standard-gamut color for everyday content consumption
- IPS contrast ratio (1500 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing environments vs VA/OLED
- No USB-C or Thunderbolt — cannot connect modern laptops with single-cable convenience
- No HDR certification — standard dynamic range only; HDR content will be tone-mapped
- No built-in Ethernet — network hub functionality absent; separate adapter required
- No USB hub — peripherals must connect directly to PC; impacts desk cable management
- IPS glow — light bleed visible at screen corners in dark scenes; common IPS characteristic
- On-screen display menus can require several button presses to navigate basic settings — verify whether this affects your specific use case before purchase
- Matte coating slightly reduces perceived colour vibrancy compared to glossy alternatives — verify whether this affects your specific use case before purchase
- No factory calibration certificate included — colour-critical work may need professional calibration
- Stand assembly requires tools and time — not tool-free like some competing mount solutions
- IPS panel — consistent 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, uniform color reproduction
- 350 cd/m² calibrated display — consistent, eye-friendly brightness for extended work sessions
- QHD resolution (2560 x 1440) — 78% more pixels than Full HD for noticeably sharper visuals
- 5.0 ms (GtG) at 75Hz — accurate, responsive motion for productive and media use
- 99% sRGB — near-complete standard gamut for consistent, accurate colors across content
- IPS contrast (1000 : 1) — blacks appear grey in dark environments compared to VA or OLED panels
- No Thunderbolt 4 — USB-C available but limited to lower bandwidth without 40 Gbps capability
- No HDR certification — standard dynamic range only; HDR content is tone-mapped without uplift
- 75Hz refresh rate — noticeably less smooth than 120/144Hz options for fast motion content
- No built-in Ethernet — monitor lacks wired network hub; separate dongle or switch required
Dell S2725DSM at 144Hz versus 75Hz -- 69Hz more smoothness for fast-paced games. Gaming-ready.
🏆 Dell S2725DSMBoth displays share QHD resolution at 109 PPI. Text sharpness and screen real estate are equivalent -- consider connectivity (USB-C, KVM) and stand ergonomics for your workspace.
🏆 Dell S2725DSMColour accuracy depends on gamut coverage -- see the specification table for DCI-P3 and sRGB figures. Wide-gamut panels benefit photo editors and video colourists working in HDR workflows. Neither includes a factory calibration cert — colour-critical work may require professional calibration post-purchase.
🏆 Dell S2725DSMNeither display carries an HDR certification. For movies and multimedia, contrast ratio is the key differentiator — Dell S2725DSM achieves 1,500:1 versus 1,000:1, producing deeper blacks in dark scenes.
🏆 Dell S2725DSM| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 7.4/10★★★★★ |
7.4/10★★★★★ |
| Brand | Dell | Benq |
| Category | Monitor | Monitor |
| Basic Information | ||
| Brand | Dell | BenQ |
| Model | S2725DSM | GW2790QT |
| Series | - | GW |
| Model Alias | - | - |
| Model Year | 2025 | 2023 |
| Display | ||
| Size Class | 27-inch | 27-inch |
| Panel Type ? | IPS | IPS |
| Curvature | -- | -- |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Pixel Density | 109 PPI | 108 PPI |
| Pixel Pitch | 0.233 mm (millimeters) | 0.233 mm (millimeters) |
| Display Area | 92.04 % (percent) | 87.96 % (percent) |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Color Depth | 8 bits | 8 bits |
| Colors | 16777216 colors | 16777216 colors |
| sRGB | 99% | 99% |
| DCI-P3 Coverage | - | - |
| HDR Support ? | - | - |
| Brightness & Contrast | ||
| Brightness (Typical) | 350 cd/m² | 350 cd/m² |
| Peak Brightness | - | - |
| Contrast | 1500 : 1 | 1000 : 1 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 48 Hz - 144 Hz | 48 Hz - 75 Hz |
| Response Time | 4 ms (GtG)1 ms (MPRT) | 5 ms (GtG) |
| Adaptive Sync ? | AMD FreeSync | - |
| Display Technologies | ||
| Advanced Display Technologies | Panel Technology: - Backlight: W-LED Viewing Angles: 178° / 178° (Horizontal / Vertical) MPRT Response: 1 ms (MPRT) Dynamic Contrast: - Input Lag: - Screen Coating: Anti-glare/Matte (3H) |
Panel Technology: - Backlight: W-LED Viewing Angles: 178° / 178° (H / V) MPRT Response: - Dynamic Contrast: - Input Lag: - Screen Coating: Anti-glare/Matte (3H) |
| Camera | ||
| Camera | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Audio | 2 x 3 W (watts) | 2 x 2 W (watts) | 3.5 mm Audio Out |
| Connectivity & Ports | ||
| Ports | 1 x HDMI 2.1 (TMDS) 1 x DisplayPort 1.4 High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 1.4 |
1 x USB (Type-C; upstream; 65W; DP Alt Mode) 1 x USB (Type-C; downstream) 3 x USB 3.2 (Type-A; downstream) 1 x HDMI 1.4 1 x DisplayPort 1.2 (out with MST) 1 x DisplayPort 1.2 1 x 3.5 mm Audio Out High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 1.4 |
| Wireless | - | - |
| Ergonomics | ||
| VESA Mount | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
| Height Adjustment | 110 mm | 110 mm |
| Pivot | ±90° | ±0° |
| Swivel | ±30° | ±20° |
| Tilt | -5° to +21° | -5° to +20° |
| Removable Stand | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming Features | ||
| Gaming Features | AMD FreeSync technology | AMA (Advanced Motion Accelerator) |
| Smart & Software Features | ||
| Operating System | - | - |
| Smart Features | 3-sided bezelless design Adaptive-Sync technology ComfortView Plus Flicker-free technology Low Blue Light |
Brightness Intelligence Gen 2 (B.I. Gen 2) Color Weakness Eye Reminder ePaper Flicker-free technology Light Sensor Low Blue Light |
| Power Consumption | ||
| Voltage | 100–240V | 100–240V |
| Frequency | 50/60Hz | 50/60Hz |
| Average Consumption | 21.4W | - |
| Maximum Consumption | 65W | 150W |
| Standby | 0.3W | - |
| Certificates | ||
| Certificates | ENERGY STAR 8.0 RoHS TÜV Rheinland Eye Comfort 3.0 (4-star rating) TÜV Rheinland Flicker Free Certified TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light Certified (Hardware Solution) |
Energy Star 8.0 EPEAT TCO Certified 9.0 TÜV RheinlandLow Blue Light TÜV RheinlandFlicker-free |
| Design, Build & Dimensions | ||
| Without Stand Width | 611.34 mm | 614 mm |
| Without Stand Height | 355.98 mm | 372.3 mm |
| Without Stand Depth | 58.87 mm | 62 mm |
| Without Stand Weight | 4.34 kg | 5.5 kg |
| With Stand Width | 611.34 mm | 614 mm |
| With Stand Height | 390.13 mm | 424.3 mm |
| With Stand Depth | 201.83 mm | 238.5 mm |
| With Stand Weight | 6.39 kg | 8.4 kg |
| Color | Ash White | White |
| Operating Conditions | ||
| Temperature | 0°C – 40°C | - |
| Humidity | 10% – 80% | - |
Both displays use IPS panel technology, so panel-level contrast and viewing angles are comparable. The differences come down to calibration, brightness, and HDR tier.
Refresh rate is the headline gaming spec. Dell S2725DSM runs at 144Hz versus 75Hz on Benq GW2790QT -- a 69Hz gap. 144Hz is the entry point for serious gaming. The Dell S2725DSM reaches this threshold; the Benq GW2790QT at 75Hz is adequate for casual gaming but not competitive play.On response time: Dell S2725DSM (4 ms (GtG)1 ms (MPRT)) versus Benq GW2790QT (5 ms (GtG)). VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) eliminates screen tearing by syncing the monitor to your GPU's frame output. Both monitors support adaptive sync: Dell S2725DSM with AMD FreeSync, and Benq GW2790QT with -.
HDR certification not disclosed for either display. Assume SDR-only output unless confirmed by the manufacturer.
Both share QHD resolution, but Dell S2725DSM has a marginally higher pixel density (109 vs 108 PPI) -- a small but noticeable difference for fine text at close range. Neither monitor offers full ergonomic adjustment. A VESA monitor arm is recommended for proper positioning if you spend long hours at your desk.
Both monitors share QHD (1440p) resolution, but refresh rate targets differ. Pushing Dell S2725DSM to 144Hz requires more GPU headroom than 75Hz. Mid-range and budget GPU tiers below reflect the lower 75Hz target; top-tier GPUs unlock the full 144Hz potential.
Benq GW2790QT has a significantly richer connectivity package. Key advantages: USB-C 65W -- single cable powers and connects a laptop. The Dell S2725DSM covers standard display inputs but lacks these hub and convenience features -- if you work at a desk and connect a laptop daily, this gap matters considerably.
Connectivity score methodology: USB-C Power Delivery (2 pts) · USB hub ports (2 pts) · Ethernet (1 pt) · HDMI 2.1 (1 pt) · KVM switch (2 pts) · Thunderbolt (2 pts). Higher score = more complete connectivity package. Ties broken in favour of USB-C power delivery.
Both monitors have basic stand adjustment. If you need precise positioning, a VESA-compatible monitor arm is recommended -- check the spec table for VESA mount support (typically 75×75mm or 100×100mm).
Use our free screen size comparison tool, PPI calculator, and power consumption calculator to go deeper than spec numbers alone. These display comparison tools help you accurately compare monitors and TVs beyond what a spec table shows -- from physical dimensions to real-world electricity costs.
Bottom line: For most buyers, the Dell S2725DSM is the stronger choice, leading on full height and tilt adjustment, QHD resolution, 99% sRGB colour accuracy. The Benq GW2790QT is worth considering if cost is the deciding factor or if its specific connectivity or form factor better matches your desk setup. Check the use-case categories above to see which display wins for your primary activity.
Dell S2725DSM vs Benq GW2790QT: What Actually Matters
On paper, Dell S2725DSM and Benq GW2790QT share several headline specs -- but the differences that matter emerge when you look at panel characteristics, factory calibration, and ergonomic flexibility rather than just the spec sheet totals.
If we had to pick one for most people, the Dell S2725DSM earns the recommendation on overall specification strength and a 3.7/5 composite score. That said, the right answer genuinely depends on your GPU, your use case split between gaming and productivity, and whether you spend time in a bright or dark room.
Strengths Worth Knowing
The Dell S2725DSM stands out for ips panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction and anti-glare matte coating — effective reflections control for comfortable all-day use. The main compromise: ips contrast ratio (1500 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing environments vs va/oled.
The Benq GW2790QT stands out for ips panel — consistent 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, uniform color reproduction and 350 cd/m² calibrated display — consistent, eye-friendly brightness for extended work sessions. The main compromise: ips contrast (1000 : 1) — blacks appear grey in dark environments compared to va or oled panels.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
For gaming, the Dell S2725DSM has the edge thanks to its 144Hz maximum refresh rate. Higher refresh rates produce smoother motion and reduce perceived input lag -- critical advantages in competitive shooters and action titles. If both share the same Hz, compare response time in the spec table above.
Both the Dell S2725DSM and Benq GW2790QT use IPS -- the differences lie in calibration, colour volume, and connectivity rather than panel technology. Check the spec table for DCI-P3 coverage and brightness figures.
For all-day productivity work -- documents, spreadsheets, coding, and content creation -- resolution and panel colour accuracy matter most. The Dell S2725DSM is the stronger daily driver based on overall specification score. For long hours, also look for a model with flicker-free backlight and low blue-light mode -- check the spec table above for those details.
The Dell S2725DSM is the stronger all-round choice based on its overall score of 3.7/5. That said, if your priority is specifically competitive gaming at the highest possible refresh rate, see the Quick Answer section at the top of this page for use-case-specific recommendations. The Benq GW2790QT is not a bad choice -- it simply trails on overall specification weight, which may not reflect the single spec most important to your setup.
IPS (In-Plane Switching) panels are the most common in quality monitors -- they offer wide viewing angles and accurate colour reproduction, making them ideal for design work, general use, and brightly lit rooms. VA (Vertical Alignment) panels have a higher native contrast ratio, producing deeper blacks, which benefits dark-room gaming and movie watching. OLED panels work differently: each pixel emits its own light, enabling true blacks, near-infinite contrast, and perfect viewing angles -- at the cost of higher price and some burn-in risk with static content.
For non-gaming use -- web browsing, documents, video calls -- 60Hz to 75Hz is completely adequate and you will not feel the difference from a 144Hz or 240Hz panel. Where higher refresh rates genuinely improve the experience beyond gaming is in cursor smoothness during scrolling and desktop navigation, which some users appreciate. In short: the step from 60Hz to 75Hz has minimal benefit; the step from 60Hz to 144Hz is noticeable but not essential for productivity.
Disclaimer: You can write your own disclaimer from APS Settings -> General -> Disclaimer Note.