Dell S2725DSM vs Benq GW2490TC
Both the Dell S2725DSM and Benq GW2490TC use the same panel technology, so the most meaningful difference is resolution. Dell S2725DSM at QHD gives you sharper detail and more room to work — you'll notice it most in fine text, photo editing, and games with detailed environments. The 1080p alternative asks less of your GPU and is easier to run at max settings.
Buy the Dell S2725DSM if you need QHD (sharp, high-density display for detailed productiv).
- Ergonomics — 110 mm height, pivot — adjustable for any desk setup
- 350 cd/m² — brightness — better visibility in bright office environments
Buy the Benq GW2490TC if you need USB-C (USB-C — single-cable connection for modern laptops).
- Daisy-chain — DisplayPort MST out — chain multiple monitors from one cable
- Full HD — 1080p resolution — sharp everyday display
- Ergonomics — 150 mm height, pivot — adjustable for any desk setup
Dell S2725DSM
- Dell S2725DSM -- Response Time: 4 ms (GtG)1 ms (MPRT) -- faster GtG response -- sharper motion, less ghosting
- Dell S2725DSM -- Brightness (Typical): 350 cd/m² -- brighter -- better HDR impact and bright-room visibility
- Dell S2725DSM -- Pixel Density: 109 PPI -- sharper image -- more pixels per inch
- Dell S2725DSM -- Display Size: 27-inch -- bigger screen -- more immersive for gaming and media
- Dell S2725DSM -- Adaptive Sync: AMD FreeSync
Benq GW2490TC
- Benq GW2490TC -- Response Time: 5 ms (GtG) -- slower GtG response -- more visible blur in fast scenes
- Benq GW2490TC -- Brightness (Typical): 250 cd/m² -- ⚠️ lower typical brightness -- HDR scenes still benefit from panel contrast, but bright-room visibility is reduced versus higher-nit alternatives
- Benq GW2490TC -- Pixel Density: 92 PPI -- lower pixel density -- softer at close viewing distances
- Benq GW2490TC -- Display Size: 23.8-inch -- smaller screen
- Benq GW2490TC -- Adaptive Sync: AMD FreeSync VESA AdaptiveSync -- broader VRR support
- IPS panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction
- Anti-glare matte coating — effective reflections control for comfortable all-day use
- QHD resolution (2560 x 1440) — 78% more pixels than FHD for crisp, detailed visuals
- 144Hz refresh rate — significantly smoother motion than standard 60/75Hz displays
- 4.0 ms (GtG) — clean pixel transitions for everyday content and media
- 1 ms (MPRT) — sharper moving images with reduced perceived motion blur
- 350 cd/m² brightness — adequate luminance for typical indoor lighting conditions
- 99% sRGB — near-complete standard gamut for precise color work
- Variable refresh (AMD FreeSync) — eliminates tearing and stutter for smooth gaming
- 8-bit color panel — accurate standard-gamut color for everyday content consumption
- IPS contrast ratio (1500 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing environments vs VA/OLED
- No USB-C or Thunderbolt — cannot connect modern laptops with single-cable convenience
- No HDR certification — standard dynamic range only; HDR content will be tone-mapped
- No built-in Ethernet — network hub functionality absent; separate adapter required
- No USB hub — peripherals must connect directly to PC; impacts desk cable management
- IPS glow — light bleed visible at screen corners in dark scenes; common IPS characteristic
- On-screen display menus can require several button presses to navigate basic settings — verify whether this affects your specific use case before purchase
- Matte coating slightly reduces perceived colour vibrancy compared to glossy alternatives — verify whether this affects your specific use case before purchase
- No factory calibration certificate included — colour-critical work may need professional calibration
- Stand assembly requires tools and time — not tool-free like some competing mount solutions
- IPS panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction
- 250 cd/m² anti-glare display — comfortable for all-day viewing in typical room lighting
- Full HD at 92 PPI — clear, sharp 1080p for gaming and everyday content
- 144Hz refresh rate — noticeably smoother and more responsive than standard 60/75Hz displays
- 99% sRGB — near-complete standard gamut for accurate colors across all content types
- IPS contrast (1500 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing conditions compared to VA or OLED
- Full HD resolution — adequate for this size but less sharp than QHD alternatives
- No Thunderbolt 4 — USB-C available but lacks high-speed 40 Gbps bandwidth and high-watt charging
- No HDR certification — standard dynamic range only; HDR content will be tone-mapped without uplift
- No built-in Ethernet — monitor lacks wired network hub functionality
Both displays run at 144Hz -- gaming smoothness is equivalent. Response time (4 ms (GtG)1 ms (MPRT)) becomes the deciding factor.
🏆 Dell S2725DSMDell S2725DSM at QHD offers noticeably sharper text and more screen real estate than FHD -- a real advantage for long coding or document sessions.
🏆 Dell S2725DSMColour accuracy depends on gamut coverage -- see the specification table for DCI-P3 and sRGB figures. Wide-gamut panels benefit photo editors and video colourists working in HDR workflows. Neither includes a factory calibration cert — colour-critical work may require professional calibration post-purchase.
🏆 Dell S2725DSMFor movies and multimedia, contrast ratio and peak brightness have the biggest real-world impact. Check the spec table for HDR certification and nits figures.
🏆 Dell S2725DSM| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 7.4/10★★★★★ |
7.6/10★★★★★ |
| Brand | Dell | Benq |
| Category | Monitor | Monitor |
| Basic Information | ||
| Brand | Dell | BenQ |
| Model | S2725DSM | GW2490TC |
| Series | - | GW |
| Model Alias | - | - |
| Model Year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Display | ||
| Size Class | 27-inch | 23.8-inch |
| Panel Type ? | IPS | IPS |
| Curvature | -- | -- |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Pixel Density | 109 PPI | 92 PPI |
| Pixel Pitch | 0.233 mm (millimeters) | 0.311 mm (millimeters) |
| Display Area | 92.04 % (percent) | 91.86 % (percent) |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Color Depth | 8 bits | 8 bits |
| Colors | 16777216 colors | 16777216 colors |
| sRGB | 99% | 99% |
| DCI-P3 Coverage | - | - |
| HDR Support ? | - | - |
| Brightness & Contrast | ||
| Brightness (Typical) | 350 cd/m² | 250 cd/m² |
| Peak Brightness | - | - |
| Contrast | 1500 : 1 | 1500 : 1 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 48 Hz - 144 Hz | 48 Hz - 144 Hz |
| Response Time | 4 ms (GtG)1 ms (MPRT) | 5 ms (GtG) |
| Adaptive Sync ? | AMD FreeSync | AMD FreeSync VESA AdaptiveSync |
| Display Technologies | ||
| Advanced Display Technologies | Panel Technology: - Backlight: W-LED Viewing Angles: 178° / 178° (Horizontal / Vertical) MPRT Response: 1 ms (MPRT) Dynamic Contrast: - Input Lag: - Screen Coating: Anti-glare/Matte (3H) |
Panel Technology: - Backlight: W-LED Viewing Angles: 178° / 178° (H / V) MPRT Response: - Dynamic Contrast: - Input Lag: - Screen Coating: Anti-glare/Matte (3H) |
| Camera | ||
| Camera | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Audio | 2 x 3 W (watts) | 2 x 2 W (watts) | 3.5 mm Audio Out |
| Connectivity & Ports | ||
| Ports | 1 x HDMI 2.1 (TMDS) 1 x DisplayPort 1.4 High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 1.4 |
1 x USB 3.0 (Type-C; upstream; 20W; DP Alt Mode) 1 x HDMI 1.4 1 x DisplayPort 1.2 1 x 3.5 mm Audio Out High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 1.4 |
| Wireless | - | - |
| Ergonomics | ||
| VESA Mount | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
| Height Adjustment | 110 mm | 150 mm |
| Pivot | ±90° | ±0° |
| Swivel | ±30° | ±45° |
| Tilt | -5° to +21° | -5° to +35° |
| Removable Stand | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming Features | ||
| Gaming Features | AMD FreeSync technology | Adaptive-Sync technology Advanced Motion Accelerator (AMA) AMD FreeSync technology |
| Smart & Software Features | ||
| Operating System | - | - |
| Smart Features | 3-sided bezelless design Adaptive-Sync technology ComfortView Plus Flicker-free technology Low Blue Light |
4-sided Ultrathin Bezel Design Color Weakness Mode ePaper Mode Eye-CareU Flicker-free technology Light Sensor Low Blue Light Plus Visual Optimizer (former B.I.+) |
| Power Consumption | ||
| Voltage | 100–240V | 100–240V |
| Frequency | 50/60Hz | 50/60Hz |
| Average Consumption | 21.4W | 12W |
| Maximum Consumption | 65W | 54W |
| Standby | 0.3W | - |
| Certificates | ||
| Certificates | ENERGY STAR 8.0 RoHS TÜV Rheinland Eye Comfort 3.0 (4-star rating) TÜV Rheinland Flicker Free Certified TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light Certified (Hardware Solution) |
Energy Star 8.0 EPEAT Bronze TCO Certified 9.0 TÜV Eye Comfort 3.0 TÜV Rheinland Flicker-free TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light (Hardware Solution) |
| Design, Build & Dimensions | ||
| Without Stand Width | 611.34 mm | 539.8 mm |
| Without Stand Height | 355.98 mm | 315.1 mm |
| Without Stand Depth | 58.87 mm | 63.6 mm |
| Without Stand Weight | 4.34 kg | 3.2 kg |
| With Stand Width | 611.34 mm | 539.8 mm |
| With Stand Height | 390.13 mm | 372 mm |
| With Stand Depth | 201.83 mm | 241.6 mm |
| With Stand Weight | 6.39 kg | 5.7 kg |
| Color | Ash White | White |
| Operating Conditions | ||
| Temperature | 0°C – 40°C | - |
| Humidity | 10% – 80% | - |
Both displays use IPS panel technology, so panel-level contrast and viewing angles are comparable. The differences come down to calibration, brightness, and HDR tier.
Both monitors run at 144Hz -- gaming smoothness is equivalent. Response time and VRR support become the key differentiators. On response time: Dell S2725DSM (4 ms (GtG)1 ms (MPRT)) versus Benq GW2490TC (5 ms (GtG)). VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) eliminates screen tearing by syncing the monitor to your GPU's frame output. Both monitors support adaptive sync: Dell S2725DSM with AMD FreeSync, and Benq GW2490TC with AMD FreeSync VESA AdaptiveSync.
HDR certification not disclosed for either display. Assume SDR-only output unless confirmed by the manufacturer.
Dell S2725DSM at QHD gives noticeably sharper text than FHD -- more pixels per inch means finer fonts and crisper UI at close desk distances. Neither monitor offers full ergonomic adjustment. A VESA monitor arm is recommended for proper positioning if you spend long hours at your desk.
These two monitors have different resolution targets, so GPU requirements differ. Dell S2725DSM at QHD (1440p) and 144Hz demands more GPU headroom than Benq GW2490TC at FHD (1080p) and 144Hz. GPU tiers below cover both monitors.
Both monitors offer comparable connectivity. HDMI 2.1 on both supports console gaming at high frame rates.
Connectivity score methodology: USB-C Power Delivery (2 pts) · USB hub ports (2 pts) · Ethernet (1 pt) · HDMI 2.1 (1 pt) · KVM switch (2 pts) · Thunderbolt (2 pts). Higher score = more complete connectivity package. Ties broken in favour of USB-C power delivery.
Both monitors have basic stand adjustment. If you need precise positioning, a VESA-compatible monitor arm is recommended -- check the spec table for VESA mount support (typically 75×75mm or 100×100mm).
Use our free screen size comparison tool, PPI calculator, and power consumption calculator to go deeper than spec numbers alone. These display comparison tools help you accurately compare monitors and TVs beyond what a spec table shows -- from physical dimensions to real-world electricity costs.
Bottom line: For most buyers, the Dell S2725DSM is the stronger choice, leading on full height and tilt adjustment, QHD resolution, 99% sRGB colour accuracy. The Benq GW2490TC is worth considering if cost is the deciding factor or if its specific connectivity or form factor better matches your desk setup. Check the use-case categories above to see which display wins for your primary activity.
Dell S2725DSM vs Benq GW2490TC: What Actually Matters
On paper, Dell S2725DSM and Benq GW2490TC share several headline specs -- but the differences that matter emerge when you look at panel characteristics, factory calibration, and ergonomic flexibility rather than just the spec sheet totals.
On the sharpness question: QHD resolution on the Dell S2725DSM renders noticeably crisper text and finer detail than Full HD -- particularly visible on a 27-inch panel where pixel density directly affects how clean fonts and fine UI elements look at normal viewing distances. The trade-off is GPU demand; pushing QHD at high refresh rates requires meaningfully more graphics horsepower.
Strengths Worth Knowing
The Dell S2725DSM stands out for ips panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction and anti-glare matte coating — effective reflections control for comfortable all-day use. The main compromise: ips contrast ratio (1500 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing environments vs va/oled.
The Benq GW2490TC stands out for ips panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction and 250 cd/m² anti-glare display — comfortable for all-day viewing in typical room lighting. The main compromise: ips contrast (1500 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing conditions compared to va or oled.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
For gaming, the Dell S2725DSM has the edge thanks to its 144Hz maximum refresh rate. Higher refresh rates produce smoother motion and reduce perceived input lag -- critical advantages in competitive shooters and action titles. If both share the same Hz, compare response time in the spec table above.
Both the Dell S2725DSM and Benq GW2490TC use IPS -- the differences lie in resolution: QHD versus 1080p. Resolution affects pixel sharpness, screen real estate, and the GPU horsepower needed to run games at full Hz.
The Dell S2725DSM runs at QHD versus 1080p on the other. QHD resolution means more pixels per inch -- sharper detail in games and more screen real estate for multitasking. The trade-off is that QHD gaming requires more GPU or console horsepower to maintain high frame rates. If you are on a mid-range setup, 1080p will achieve higher, smoother frame rates more easily.
For all-day productivity work -- documents, spreadsheets, coding, and content creation -- resolution and panel colour accuracy matter most. The Dell S2725DSM is the stronger daily driver based on overall specification score. For long hours, also look for a model with flicker-free backlight and low blue-light mode -- check the spec table above for those details.
The Dell S2725DSM is the stronger all-round choice based on its overall score of 3.7/5. That said, if your priority is specifically display image quality and colour accuracy, see the Quick Answer section at the top of this page for use-case-specific recommendations. The Benq GW2490TC is not a bad choice -- it simply trails on overall specification weight, which may not reflect the single spec most important to your setup.
IPS (In-Plane Switching) panels are the most common in quality monitors -- they offer wide viewing angles and accurate colour reproduction, making them ideal for design work, general use, and brightly lit rooms. VA (Vertical Alignment) panels have a higher native contrast ratio, producing deeper blacks, which benefits dark-room gaming and movie watching. OLED panels work differently: each pixel emits its own light, enabling true blacks, near-infinite contrast, and perfect viewing angles -- at the cost of higher price and some burn-in risk with static content.
For non-gaming use -- web browsing, documents, video calls -- 60Hz to 75Hz is completely adequate and you will not feel the difference from a 144Hz or 240Hz panel. Where higher refresh rates genuinely improve the experience beyond gaming is in cursor smoothness during scrolling and desktop navigation, which some users appreciate. In short: the step from 60Hz to 75Hz has minimal benefit; the step from 60Hz to 144Hz is noticeable but not essential for productivity.
Disclaimer: You can write your own disclaimer from APS Settings -> General -> Disclaimer Note.