LG 24G411A vs Acer Nitro VG240Y P6bip Comparison
The LG 24G411A and Acer Nitro VG240Y P6bip share the same core formula: a 23.8-inch Full HD IPS panel, 144Hz refresh rate, 99% sRGB coverage and a rated 1500:1 contrast ratio. LG separates itself through HDR10, native 8-bit colour, G-SYNC compatibility and a broader collection of gaming tools. Acer answers with lower power consumption, a lighter chassis and the same essential 144Hz experience. The LG is the more complete gaming monitor, while the Acer remains attractive when simplicity, efficiency or a lower purchase cost takes priority.
Resolution, screen size, rated brightness, sRGB coverage and contrast are effectively matched, so basic sharpness and colour range should be similar. The meaningful distinction is how colour and HDR are handled. LG lists native 8-bit colour and HDR10 support, whereas the Acer uses 6-bit plus FRC and does not list HDR. That gives the LG a modest advantage for games and media with richer gradients, although neither monitor is built for high-impact HDR.
Both displays run at up to 144Hz and support Adaptive-Sync with AMD FreeSync, so either can provide smooth gameplay when paired with a capable PC. LG adds official G-SYNC compatibility and several practical gaming controls, including Black Stabilizer, Crosshair, FPS Counter and Dynamic Action Sync. Acer’s 1ms VRB mode is designed to reduce perceived blur, but its overall gaming feature set is more basic and less configurable.
LG provides HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4 and a 3.5mm audio output, giving it newer connection standards and a convenient way to route headphones or speakers. Acer uses HDMI 1.4 and DisplayPort 1.2, with no audio jack listed in the supplied specifications. Neither stand supports height, swivel or pivot adjustment, although both include 100 × 100 mm VESA mounting for buyers who plan to add a monitor arm.
Acer has a clear efficiency advantage, with 14W listed average consumption compared with 24.47W for the LG. It is also lighter with the stand attached, which may help in portable or multi-screen setups. LG justifies a moderate premium through its stronger connectivity, native 8-bit panel, HDR support and wider gaming feature set. Acer becomes the better-value choice when it is substantially cheaper and those additions are not important.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 6.8 / 10 | 6.2 / 10 |
| Brand | LG | acer |
| Category | Monitor | Monitor |
| Model Information | ||
| Brand | LG | Acer |
| Series | Ultra Gear | Nitro VG0 |
| Model | 24G411A | Nitro VG240Y P6bip |
| Model Alias | Ultra Gear 24G411A 24G411A-B | VG240YP6bip UM.QV0AA.602 |
| Full Product Name | LG Ultra Gear 24G411A | Acer Nitro VG240Y P6bip |
| Model Year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Monitor Type | Gaming Monitor | -- |
| Available Colors | Black | Black |
| Display & Panel | ||
| Screen Size | 23.8 in | 23.8 in |
| Exact Diagonal | 23.807 in (604.698 mm) | -- |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 (1.778:1) | 16:9 |
| Active Display Width | 527.04 mm | -- |
| Active Display Height | 296.46 mm | -- |
| Display Area | 91.39% | 90.99% |
| Panel Type? | IPS | IPS |
| Panel Technology | IPS | IPS |
| Backlight Type? | W-LED | W-LED |
| 3D Support | No | -- |
| Screen Coating | Anti-glare/Matte (3H) | Anti-glare/Matte (3H) |
| Coating Hardness | 3H | -- |
| Resolution & Pixel Details | ||
| Native Resolution | 1920 × 1080 pixels | 1920 × 1080 pixels (Full HD / 1080p) |
| Resolution Name | Full HD / 1080p | -- |
| Aspect Ratio Resolution | 16:9 | -- |
| Pixel Density | 92 ppi (36 ppcm) | 92 PPI |
| Pixel Pitch | 0.275 mm | 0.275 mm |
| Picture Quality & Color | ||
| Panel Bit Depth | 8 bits | 8 bits (6 bits + FRC) |
| FRC | -- | Yes |
| Display Colors | 16,777,216 colors | 16777216 colors (24-bit) |
| Total Color Bits | 24 bits | -- |
| Typical Brightness | 250 cd/m² | -- |
| Static Contrast Ratio | 1500:1 | -- |
| Horizontal Viewing Angle | 178° | -- |
| Vertical Viewing Angle | 178° | -- |
| HDR Support? | HDR10 | -- |
| HDR Formats? | HDR10 | -- |
| HDR10? | Yes | -- |
| sRGB Coverage | 99% | -- |
| Factory Calibration | Yes | -- |
| Refresh Rate, Response & Gaming | ||
| Native Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | -- |
| Refresh Rate Range | 48–144 Hz | 48 Hz - 144 Hz |
| Overclocked Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | -- |
| Minimum Response Time | 5 ms | -- |
| MPRT Response Time | 1 ms | -- |
| Variable Refresh Rate | Yes | -- |
| Adaptive-Sync? | Adaptive-Sync technology | -- |
| AMD FreeSync? | AMD FreeSync technology | -- |
| NVIDIA G-Sync? | NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible | -- |
| Motion Blur Reduction | Motion Blur Reduction | -- |
| Black Stabilizer | Yes | -- |
| Crosshair | Yes | -- |
| FPS Counter | Yes | -- |
| Dynamic Action Sync | Yes | -- |
| Ports & Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 ×HDMI 2.0 |
1×HDMI 1.4 |
| HDMI Version | HDMI 2.0 | HDMI 1.4 |
| DisplayPort Input | 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 | 1× DisplayPort 1.2 |
| DisplayPort Version | DisplayPort 1.4 | DisplayPort 1.2 |
| HDCP Support | Yes | -- |
| Audio Output | 1 × 3.5 mm Audio Out (3-pole) | -- |
| Headphone Output | Yes | -- |
| Audio, Camera, Network & Smart Features | ||
| Built-In Speakers | No | -- |
| Built-In Camera | No | No |
| Ergonomics & Stand | ||
| VESA Mount | Yes | 100 × 100 mm |
| VESA Size | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Removable Stand | Yes | Yes |
| Height Adjustment | No | No |
| Tilt Adjustment | Yes | -- |
| Forward Tilt | 5° | -- |
| Backward Tilt | 21° | -- |
| Swivel Adjustment | No | -- |
| Pivot Adjustment | No | -- |
| Portrait Mode | No | -- |
| Security Lock | Kensington anti-theft stand lock slot | -- |
| Dimensions, Weight & Design | ||
| Dimensions With Stand | 538.5 × 411.5 × 221 mm | -- |
| Dimensions Without Stand | 538.5 × 317.5 × 38.1 mm | -- |
| Weight With Stand | 3.81 kg | 3 kg |
| Weight Without Stand | 2.4 kg | 2.6 kg |
| Stand Depth | 221 mm | -- |
| Chassis Color | Black | -- |
| Power & Operating Conditions | ||
| Power Input | 100–240 V AC | 100 V - 120 V (110V) / 220 V - 240 V (220V) |
| 110V Input Range | 100–120 V | -- |
| 220V Input Range | 220–240 V | -- |
| AC Frequency | 50–60 Hz | 50 Hz - 60 Hz |
| Electric Current | 1.5 A | -- |
| Typical Power Consumption | -- | 14 W |
| Average Power Consumption | 24.47 W | 14 W |
| Maximum Power Consumption | -- | 36 W |
| Sleep Consumption | 0.5 W | 0.5 W |
| Off Consumption | 0.3 W | -- |
| Operating Temperature | 5–35 °C | -- |
| Operating Humidity | 10–80% | -- |
| Storage Temperature | -20–60 °C | -- |
| Storage Humidity | 5–85% | -- |
| Eye Care, Protection & Additional Features | ||
| Flicker-Free | Yes | -- |
| Low Blue Light | Yes | -- |
| Reader Mode | Yes | -- |
| Monitor Management Software | LG Switch | -- |
| Auto Input Switching | Yes | -- |
| Smart Energy Saving | Yes | -- |
| Additional Monitor Features | Color Weakness Mode Deep Black HDR Effect | -- |
| Certifications, Standards & Licenses | ||
| Energy Star | Energy Star | -- |
| RoHS | Ro HS | Ro HS |
| CE | CE | Yes |
| FCC | -- | FCC |
| ErP | Er P | -- |
| PSE | PSE | -- |
| WEEE | WEEE | -- |
| VCCI | VCCI-B | -- |
| TÜV Type Approval | TÜV-Bauart | -- |
| Included Accessories | ||
| HDMI Cable | HDMI cable | -- |
| Packaging Information | ||
| Package Dimensions | 620 × 386 × 134.6 mm | -- |
| Package Width | 620 mm | -- |
| Package Height | 386 mm | -- |
| Package Depth | 134.6 mm | -- |
| Package Weight | 4.58 kg | -- |
Methodology: The verdict and comparison notes on this page are written by an editor after reviewing the full specification table below; they are not generated by an automated scoring formula. Conclusions are based on manufacturer-listed specifications only - no benchmark testing, measured brightness or hands-on use is claimed unless stated. Missing values are left blank rather than estimated. Report an error.
Updated: July 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
The LG 24G411A is the more feature-complete monitor, while the Acer offers similar core 144Hz IPS performance with lower listed power use.
Yes. Both monitors support refresh rates up to 144Hz at Full HD resolution.
The LG has the advantage because it lists native 8-bit colour and HDR10, while the Acer uses 6-bit plus FRC and does not list HDR support.
The provided specifications list Adaptive-Sync and AMD FreeSync, but they do not confirm NVIDIA G-SYNC compatibility.
Acer may offer better value at a noticeably lower price, while LG is worth considering when its extra gaming features, audio output and newer ports justify the difference.