Dell SE2425HM vs Benq GW2790QT
The clearest split between the Dell SE2425HM and the Benq GW2790QT is refresh rate. Dell SE2425HM runs at 100Hz versus 75Hz on the Benq GW2790QT. That gap is meaningful in fast-paced games — enemies move more smoothly, tracking feels more responsive, and the transition from 60fps to higher frame rates is clearly visible. For everyday desktop use and productivity, both feel identically fluid.
Buy the Dell SE2425HM if you need Full HD (1080p resolution — sharp everyday display).
- IPS panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction
- Anti-glare matte coating — effective reflections control for comfortable all-day use
- Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 92 PP — sharp, clear image for everyday work and entertainment
Buy the Benq GW2790QT if you need USB-C (USB-C — single-cable connection for modern laptops).
- Daisy-chain — DisplayPort MST out — chain multiple monitors from one cable
- QHD — sharp, high-density display for detailed productivity work
- Ergonomics — 110 mm height, pivot — adjustable for any desk setup
Dell SE2425HM
- Dell SE2425HM -- Refresh Rate: 100Hz (max) -- higher max Hz -- smoother motion, competitive advantage
- Dell SE2425HM -- Brightness (Typical): 250 cd/m² -- ⚠️ lower typical brightness -- HDR scenes still benefit from panel contrast, but bright-room visibility is reduced versus higher-nit alternatives
- Dell SE2425HM -- Pixel Density: 92 PPI -- lower pixel density -- softer at close viewing distances
- Dell SE2425HM -- Display Size: 23.8-inch -- smaller screen
Benq GW2790QT
- Benq GW2790QT -- Refresh Rate: 75Hz (max) -- lower max Hz -- less fluid gameplay
- Benq GW2790QT -- Brightness (Typical): 350 cd/m² -- brighter -- better HDR impact and bright-room visibility
- Benq GW2790QT -- Pixel Density: 108 PPI -- sharper image -- more pixels per inch
- Benq GW2790QT -- Display Size: 27-inch -- bigger screen -- more immersive for gaming and media
- IPS panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction
- Anti-glare matte coating — effective reflections control for comfortable all-day use
- Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 92 PPI — sharp, clear image for everyday work and entertainment
- 100Hz refresh rate — standard rate suitable for productivity and media consumption
- 5.0 ms (GtG) — clean pixel transitions for everyday content and media
- 250 cd/m² brightness — adequate luminance for typical indoor lighting conditions
- Calibrated color display with 72% NTSC coverage
- Flicker-free backlight technology — reduces eye fatigue during extended use sessions
- 8-bit color panel — accurate standard-gamut color for everyday content consumption
- VESA 100×100 mm compatible — works with monitor arms and aftermarket mounting solutions
- IPS contrast ratio (1000 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing environments vs VA/OLED
- Full HD only — limits sharpness for detailed productivity work at this screen size
- Tilt-only stand — no height, swivel or portrait pivot adjustment available
- No USB-C or Thunderbolt — cannot connect modern laptops with single-cable convenience
- No integrated speakers — an external audio solution (speakers or headphones) is required
- 1000:1 static contrast — noticeably limited compared to VA (3000:1) or OLED panels
- No HDR certification — standard dynamic range only; HDR content will be tone-mapped
- 100Hz max refresh — not competitive for fast-paced gaming; limits motion smoothness
- No built-in Ethernet — network hub functionality absent; separate adapter required
- No DisplayPort — HDMI-only video; may limit resolution/refresh on older GPU outputs
- IPS panel — consistent 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, uniform color reproduction
- 350 cd/m² calibrated display — consistent, eye-friendly brightness for extended work sessions
- QHD resolution (2560 x 1440) — 78% more pixels than Full HD for noticeably sharper visuals
- 5.0 ms (GtG) at 75Hz — accurate, responsive motion for productive and media use
- 99% sRGB — near-complete standard gamut for consistent, accurate colors across content
- IPS contrast (1000 : 1) — blacks appear grey in dark environments compared to VA or OLED panels
- No Thunderbolt 4 — USB-C available but limited to lower bandwidth without 40 Gbps capability
- No HDR certification — standard dynamic range only; HDR content is tone-mapped without uplift
- 75Hz refresh rate — noticeably less smooth than 120/144Hz options for fast motion content
- No built-in Ethernet — monitor lacks wired network hub; separate dongle or switch required
Dell SE2425HM at 100Hz versus 75Hz -- 25Hz more smoothness for fast-paced games. Entry gaming.
🏆 Dell SE2425HMBenq GW2790QT at QHD offers noticeably sharper text and more screen real estate than FHD -- a real advantage for long coding or document sessions.
🏆 Benq GW2790QTColour accuracy depends on gamut coverage -- see the specification table for DCI-P3 and sRGB figures. Wide-gamut panels benefit photo editors and video colourists working in HDR workflows. Neither includes a factory calibration cert — colour-critical work may require professional calibration post-purchase.
🏆 Benq GW2790QTFor movies and multimedia, contrast ratio and peak brightness have the biggest real-world impact. Check the spec table for HDR certification and nits figures.
🏆 Dell SE2425HM| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 7.2/10★★★★★ |
7.4/10★★★★★ |
| Brand | Dell | Benq |
| Category | Monitor | Monitor |
| Basic Information | ||
| Brand | Dell | BenQ |
| Model | SE2425HM | GW2790QT |
| Series | - | GW |
| Model Alias | - | - |
| Model Year | 2025 | 2023 |
| Display | ||
| Size Class | 23.8-inch | 27-inch |
| Panel Type ? | IPS | IPS |
| Curvature | -- | -- |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Pixel Density | 92 PPI | 108 PPI |
| Pixel Pitch | 0.275 mm (millimeters) | 0.233 mm (millimeters) |
| Display Area | 89.49 % (percent) | 87.96 % (percent) |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Color Depth | 8 bits | 8 bits |
| Colors | 16777216 colors | 16777216 colors |
| sRGB | - | 99% |
| DCI-P3 Coverage | - | - |
| HDR Support ? | - | - |
| Brightness & Contrast | ||
| Brightness (Typical) | 250 cd/m² | 350 cd/m² |
| Peak Brightness | - | - |
| Contrast | 1000 : 1 | 1000 : 1 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 50 Hz - 100 Hz | 48 Hz - 75 Hz |
| Response Time | 5 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG) |
| Adaptive Sync ? | - | - |
| Display Technologies | ||
| Advanced Display Technologies | Panel Technology: - Backlight: W-LED Viewing Angles: 178° / 178° (Horizontal / Vertical) MPRT Response: - Dynamic Contrast: - Input Lag: - Screen Coating: Anti-glare/Matte (3H) |
Panel Technology: - Backlight: W-LED Viewing Angles: 178° / 178° (H / V) MPRT Response: - Dynamic Contrast: - Input Lag: - Screen Coating: Anti-glare/Matte (3H) |
| Camera | ||
| Camera | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Audio | - | 2 x 2 W (watts) | 3.5 mm Audio Out |
| Connectivity & Ports | ||
| Ports | 1 x HDMI 1.4 1 x D-sub High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 1.4 |
1 x USB (Type-C; upstream; 65W; DP Alt Mode) 1 x USB (Type-C; downstream) 3 x USB 3.2 (Type-A; downstream) 1 x HDMI 1.4 1 x DisplayPort 1.2 (out with MST) 1 x DisplayPort 1.2 1 x 3.5 mm Audio Out High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 1.4 |
| Wireless | - | - |
| Ergonomics | ||
| VESA Mount | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
| Height Adjustment | No | 110 mm |
| Pivot | No | ±0° |
| Swivel | No | ±20° |
| Tilt | -5° to +21° | -5° to +20° |
| Removable Stand | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming Features | ||
| Gaming Features | - | AMA (Advanced Motion Accelerator) |
| Smart & Software Features | ||
| Operating System | - | - |
| Smart Features | Flicker-free technology Low Blue Light |
Brightness Intelligence Gen 2 (B.I. Gen 2) Color Weakness Eye Reminder ePaper Flicker-free technology Light Sensor Low Blue Light |
| Power Consumption | ||
| Voltage | 100–240V | 100–240V |
| Frequency | 50/60Hz | 50/60Hz |
| Average Consumption | 14.3W | - |
| Maximum Consumption | 28.5W | 150W |
| Standby | 0.3W | - |
| Certificates | ||
| Certificates | ENERGY STAR 8.0 EPEAT RoHS TCO Certified TÜV Rheinland Eye Comfort - 3 star TÜV Rheinland Flicker Free Certified TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light Certified |
Energy Star 8.0 EPEAT TCO Certified 9.0 TÜV RheinlandLow Blue Light TÜV RheinlandFlicker-free |
| Design, Build & Dimensions | ||
| Without Stand Width | 538.73 mm | 614 mm |
| Without Stand Height | 324.1 mm | 372.3 mm |
| Without Stand Depth | 47.75 mm | 62 mm |
| Without Stand Weight | 2.8 kg | 5.5 kg |
| With Stand Width | 538.73 mm | 614 mm |
| With Stand Height | 412.24 mm | 424.3 mm |
| With Stand Depth | 178.82 mm | 238.5 mm |
| With Stand Weight | 3.47 kg | 8.4 kg |
| Color | Black | White |
| Operating Conditions | ||
| Temperature | 0°C – 40°C | - |
| Humidity | 10% – 80% | - |
Both displays use IPS panel technology, so panel-level contrast and viewing angles are comparable. The differences come down to calibration, brightness, and HDR tier.
Refresh rate is the headline gaming spec. Dell SE2425HM runs at 100Hz versus 75Hz on Benq GW2790QT -- a 25Hz gap. Both monitors sit below 144Hz. The Dell SE2425HM at 100Hz is smoother for gaming, but neither is optimised for fast-paced competitive titles. For serious gaming, consider monitors with 144Hz or above; these are better suited to productivity and general use.Both display the same response time spec (5 ms (GtG)). VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) eliminates screen tearing by syncing the monitor to your GPU's frame output. Both monitors support adaptive sync: Dell SE2425HM with -, and Benq GW2790QT with -.
HDR certification not disclosed for either display. Assume SDR-only output unless confirmed by the manufacturer.
Benq GW2790QT at QHD gives noticeably sharper text than FHD -- more pixels per inch means finer fonts and crisper UI at close desk distances. Neither monitor offers full ergonomic adjustment. A VESA monitor arm is recommended for proper positioning if you spend long hours at your desk.
These two monitors have different resolution targets, so GPU requirements differ. Dell SE2425HM at FHD (1080p) and 100Hz demands more GPU headroom than Benq GW2790QT at QHD (1440p) and 75Hz. GPU tiers below cover both monitors.
Benq GW2790QT has a significantly richer connectivity package. Key advantages: USB-C 65W -- single cable powers and connects a laptop. The Dell SE2425HM covers standard display inputs but lacks these hub and convenience features -- if you work at a desk and connect a laptop daily, this gap matters considerably.
Connectivity score methodology: USB-C Power Delivery (2 pts) · USB hub ports (2 pts) · Ethernet (1 pt) · HDMI 2.1 (1 pt) · KVM switch (2 pts) · Thunderbolt (2 pts). Higher score = more complete connectivity package. Ties broken in favour of USB-C power delivery.
Both monitors have basic stand adjustment. If you need precise positioning, a VESA-compatible monitor arm is recommended -- check the spec table for VESA mount support (typically 75×75mm or 100×100mm).
Use our free screen size comparison tool, PPI calculator, and power consumption calculator to go deeper than spec numbers alone. These display comparison tools help you accurately compare monitors and TVs beyond what a spec table shows -- from physical dimensions to real-world electricity costs.
Bottom line: For most buyers, the Benq GW2790QT is the stronger choice, leading on USB-C single-cable connectivity, full height and tilt adjustment, QHD resolution. The Dell SE2425HM is worth considering if cost is the deciding factor or if its specific connectivity or form factor better matches your desk setup. Check the use-case categories above to see which display wins for your primary activity.
Dell SE2425HM vs Benq GW2790QT: What Actually Matters
The headline difference is refresh rate: Dell SE2425HM runs at 50Hz versus 48Hz on Benq GW2790QT. That gap matters most in competitive gaming where consistent frame delivery reduces perceived input lag. For everyday desktop use, movies, and productivity work, both feel comparably fluid.
On the sharpness question: QHD resolution on the Benq GW2790QT renders noticeably crisper text and finer detail than Full HD -- particularly visible on a 27-inch panel where pixel density directly affects how clean fonts and fine UI elements look at normal viewing distances. The trade-off is GPU demand; pushing QHD at high refresh rates requires meaningfully more graphics horsepower.
Strengths Worth Knowing
The Dell SE2425HM stands out for ips panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction and anti-glare matte coating — effective reflections control for comfortable all-day use. The main compromise: ips contrast ratio (1000 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing environments vs va/oled.
The Benq GW2790QT stands out for ips panel — consistent 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, uniform color reproduction and 350 cd/m² calibrated display — consistent, eye-friendly brightness for extended work sessions. The main compromise: ips contrast (1000 : 1) — blacks appear grey in dark environments compared to va or oled panels.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
For gaming, the Dell SE2425HM has the edge thanks to its 100Hz maximum refresh rate. Higher refresh rates produce smoother motion and reduce perceived input lag -- critical advantages in competitive shooters and action titles. If both share the same Hz, compare response time in the spec table above.
Both the Dell SE2425HM and Benq GW2790QT use IPS -- the differences lie in resolution: 1080p versus QHD. Resolution affects pixel sharpness, screen real estate, and the GPU horsepower needed to run games at full Hz.
The Benq GW2790QT runs at QHD versus 1080p on the other. QHD resolution means more pixels per inch -- sharper detail in games and more screen real estate for multitasking. The trade-off is that QHD gaming requires more GPU or console horsepower to maintain high frame rates. If you are on a mid-range setup, 1080p will achieve higher, smoother frame rates more easily.
For all-day productivity work -- documents, spreadsheets, coding, and content creation -- resolution and panel colour accuracy matter most. The Benq GW2790QT is the stronger daily driver based on overall specification score. For long hours, also look for a model with flicker-free backlight and low blue-light mode -- check the spec table above for those details.
The Benq GW2790QT is the stronger all-round choice based on its overall score of 3.7/5. That said, if your priority is specifically competitive gaming at the highest possible refresh rate, see the Quick Answer section at the top of this page for use-case-specific recommendations. The Dell SE2425HM is not a bad choice -- it simply trails on overall specification weight, which may not reflect the single spec most important to your setup.
IPS (In-Plane Switching) panels are the most common in quality monitors -- they offer wide viewing angles and accurate colour reproduction, making them ideal for design work, general use, and brightly lit rooms. VA (Vertical Alignment) panels have a higher native contrast ratio, producing deeper blacks, which benefits dark-room gaming and movie watching. OLED panels work differently: each pixel emits its own light, enabling true blacks, near-infinite contrast, and perfect viewing angles -- at the cost of higher price and some burn-in risk with static content.
For non-gaming use -- web browsing, documents, video calls -- 60Hz to 75Hz is completely adequate and you will not feel the difference from a 144Hz or 240Hz panel. Where higher refresh rates genuinely improve the experience beyond gaming is in cursor smoothness during scrolling and desktop navigation, which some users appreciate. In short: the step from 60Hz to 75Hz has minimal benefit; the step from 60Hz to 144Hz is noticeable but not essential for productivity.
Disclaimer: You can write your own disclaimer from APS Settings -> General -> Disclaimer Note.