Benq MA270UP vs Dell U2725QE
Benq MA270UP
- IPS panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction
- HDR support (DisplayHDR 400) with 400 cd/m² peak — enhanced contrast for HDR media
- 4K UHD resolution at 163 PPI — razor-sharp detail for creative and professional workflows
Dell U2725QE
- IPS Black panel with local dimming — combines IPS color accuracy with dramatically deeper blacks
- Premium DisplayHDR 600 certification — vivid specular highlights and deep shadow detail
- 4K UHD resolution (3840 x 2160) at 163 PPI — razor-sharp detail for productivity and content
The main difference is refresh rate: Benq MA270UP runs at 60Hz versus 48Hz on Dell U2725QE, making it the stronger option for competitive and fast-paced gaming. Based on overall score, the Dell U2725QE is our preferred pick — earning 4.3/5.
Benq MA270UP
- Benq MA270UP — Refresh Rate: 60 Hz (hertz) — lower max Hz — less fluid gameplay
- Benq MA270UP — Brightness (Typical): 400 cd/m² — dimmer panel
- Benq MA270UP — DCI-P3 Coverage: 95% — narrower colour gamut
- Benq MA270UP — HDR: DisplayHDR 400 — HDR supported
Dell U2725QE
- Dell U2725QE — Refresh Rate: 48 Hz - 120 Hz — higher max Hz — smoother motion, competitive advantage
- Dell U2725QE — Brightness (Typical): 450 cd/m² — brighter — better HDR impact and bright-room visibility
- Dell U2725QE — DCI-P3 Coverage: 99% — wider colour gamut — richer, more saturated colours
- Dell U2725QE — HDR: DisplayHDR 600 — high-tier HDR — strong highlights and contrast
- IPS panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction
- HDR support (DisplayHDR 400) with 400 cd/m² peak — enhanced contrast for HDR media
- 4K UHD resolution at 163 PPI — razor-sharp detail for creative and professional workflows
- 95% DCI-P3 — professional-level wide-gamut color reproduction for accurate creative work
- Full ergonomic stand (height, pivot, swivel, tilt) — adaptable for comfortable long-session productivity use
- IPS contrast (1200 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing conditions compared to VA or OLED
- No Thunderbolt 4 — USB-C available but lacks high-speed 40 Gbps bandwidth and high-watt charging
- Entry-tier DisplayHDR 400 — limited local dimming means HDR uplift is modest rather than dramatic
- Peak power draw (220W) — above-average running cost; factor into long-term energy budget
- No built-in Ethernet — monitor lacks wired network hub functionality
- IPS Black panel with local dimming — combines IPS color accuracy with dramatically deeper blacks
- Premium DisplayHDR 600 certification — vivid specular highlights and deep shadow detail
- 4K UHD resolution (3840 x 2160) at 163 PPI — razor-sharp detail for productivity and content
- 120Hz refresh rate — smooth, comfortable scrolling and video playback
- 5.0 ms (GtG) — clean pixel transitions for everyday content and media
- 600 cd/m² peak brightness — vibrant HDR highlights above typical SDR levels
- 99% DCI-P3 — cinema-grade color fidelity ideal for content creation and media
- Flicker-free backlight technology — reduces eye fatigue during extended use sessions
- 10-bit color (1.07 billion colors) — smooth, banding-free gradients for professional work
- Full ergonomic stand (height adjustment, portrait pivot, swivel, tilt) — adaptable for long multi-hour work sessions
- Standard panel contrast may disappoint in dark room viewing conditions
- No integrated speakers — an external audio solution (speakers or headphones) is required
- High peak power draw (335W) — notably higher running cost than standard LCD monitors
- On-screen display menus can require several button presses to navigate basic settings
- Matte coating slightly reduces perceived colour vibrancy compared to glossy alternatives
- No factory calibration certificate included — colour-critical work may need professional calibration
- Stand assembly requires tools and time — not tool-free like some competing mount solutions
- No built-in ambient light sensor for automatic brightness adjustment to room conditions
- Limited audio features — no spatial audio or Dolby Atmos processing in the built-in speakers
- No USB-C power delivery — laptop charging through this monitor requires a separate charger
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 7.6/10★★★★★ |
8.6/10★★★★★ |
| Brand | Benq | Dell |
| Category | Monitor | Monitor |
| Basic Information | ||
| Brand | BenQ | Dell |
| Model | MA270UP | U2725QE |
| Series | DesignVue | UltraSharp |
| Model Alias | - | UltraSharp U2725QE |
| Model Year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Display | ||
| Size Class | 27-inch | 27-inch |
| Panel Type ? | IPS | IPS |
| Curvature | -- | -- |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Pixel Density | 163 PPI | 163 PPI |
| Pixel Pitch | 0.155 mm (millimeters) | 0.155 mm (millimeters) |
| Display Area | 88.75 % (percent) | 92.52 % (percent) |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Color Depth | 10 bits (8 bits + FRC) (FRC: Yes) | 10 bits (8 bits + FRC) (FRC: Yes) |
| Colors | 1073741824 colors | 1073741824 colors |
| sRGB | 99% | 100% |
| DCI-P3 Coverage | 95% | 99% |
| HDR Support ? | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR 600 |
| Brightness & Contrast | ||
| Brightness (Typical) | 400 cd/m² | 450 cd/m² |
| Peak Brightness | 400 cd/m² | 600 cd/m² |
| Contrast | 1200 : 1 | 3000 : 1 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz (hertz) | 48 Hz - 120 Hz |
| Response Time | 5 ms (GtG) | 5 ms (GtG) |
| Adaptive Sync ? | - | - |
| Display Technologies | ||
| Advanced Display Technologies | Panel Technology: Nano Gloss Panel Backlight: W-LED Viewing Angles: 178° / 178° (H / V) MPRT Response: - Dynamic Contrast: - Input Lag: - Screen Coating: Glossy |
Panel Technology: IPS Black technology | Local dimming zones - 8 Backlight: Edge LED (Local Dimming) Viewing Angles: 178° / 178° (Horizontal / Vertical) MPRT Response: - Dynamic Contrast: - Input Lag: 5 ms Screen Coating: Anti-glare/Matte (3H) |
| Camera | ||
| Camera | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Audio | 2 x 3 W (watts) | 3.5 mm Audio Out | 3.5 mm Audio Out |
| Connectivity & Ports | ||
| Ports | 1 x USB 3.2 (Type-C; Gen 1; 5 Gbps; upstream; 90W; DP Alt Mode) 1 x USB 3.2 (Type-C; Gen 1; 5 Gbps; downstream; 15) 2 x USB 3.2 (Type-A; Gen 1; 5 Gbps; downstream; 7.5W) 2 x HDMI 2.0 1 x 3.5 mm Audio Out High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 2.2 |
1 x USB 3.2 (Type-C; Gen 2; 10 Gbps; upstream; data only) 2 x USB 3.2 (Type-C; Gen 2; 10 Gbps; downstream; 15W) 5 x USB 3.2 (Type-A; Gen 2; 10 Gbps; downstream) 1 x Ethernet RJ45 (2.5 Gbps; Wake-on-LAN; MAPT; PXE Boot) 1 x HDMI 2.1 1 x DisplayPort 1.4 (out; Daisy Chain) 1 x DisplayPort 1.4 (in; DSC; HBR3) 1 x Thunderbolt 4.0 (Type-C; upstream; 140W; DP Alt Mode; DSC) 1 x Thunderbolt 4.0 (Type-C; downstream; 15W; Daisy Chain) 1 x 3.5 mm Audio Out High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 2.2 |
| Wireless | - | - |
| Ergonomics | ||
| VESA Mount | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
| Height Adjustment | 115 mm | 150 mm |
| Pivot | ±0° | ±90° |
| Swivel | ±15° | ±30° |
| Tilt | -5° to +20° | -5° to +21° |
| Removable Stand | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming Features | ||
| Gaming Features | AMA (Advanced Motion Accelerator) | Dynamic Refresh Rate (DRR) Picture-by-Picture Picture-in-Picture |
| Smart & Software Features | ||
| Operating System | - | - |
| Smart Features | Auto Pivot Color Weakness ePaper Flicker-free technology Low Blue Light MacBook Control Visual Optimizer |
Ambient Light Sensor Auto Brightness ComfortView Plus Dell Power Button Sync (DPBS) Easy Arrange Flicker-free technology IPS Black technology Low Blue Light KVM Switch (auto) Multi-Monitor Sync (MMS) |
| Power Consumption | ||
| Voltage | 100–240V | 100–240V |
| Frequency | 50/60Hz | 50/60Hz |
| Average Consumption | 40W | 30.5W |
| Maximum Consumption | 220W | 335W |
| Standby | 0.5W | 0.3W |
| Certificates | ||
| Certificates | ENERGY STAR Eye Comfort 3.0 TÜV Rheinland Flicker-free Certified TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light Certified TÜV Rheinland Reflection Free Certified |
Energy Star EPEAT Gold FCC RoHS TCO Certified Edge TÜV Rheinland Eye Comfort 3.0 with 5-star rating |
| Design, Build & Dimensions | ||
| Without Stand Width | 613.8 mm | 612.44 mm |
| Without Stand Height | 367.7 mm | 353.51 mm |
| Without Stand Depth | 83.5 mm | 55.6 mm |
| Without Stand Weight | 5.14 kg | 5.22 kg |
| With Stand Width | 613.8 mm | 612.44 mm |
| With Stand Height | 445.1 mm | 385.68 mm |
| With Stand Depth | 220.2 mm | 189 mm |
| With Stand Weight | 8.2 kg | 7.06 kg |
| Color | Silver | Black and Silver |
| Operating Conditions | ||
| Temperature | - | 0°C – 40°C |
| Humidity | - | 10% – 80% |
At 60Hz versus 48Hz, Benq MA270UP delivers meaningfully smoother motion — a real advantage in fast-paced shooters and competitive titles where frame timing matters. Response time: 5ms on Benq MA270UP keeps ghosting minimal.
🏆 Dell U2725QEBoth displays share the same 4K resolution, so text sharpness is equivalent. Ergonomics, screen real estate, and panel coating become the productivity differentiators.
🏆 Benq MA270UPColour accuracy depends on gamut coverage — see the specification table for DCI-P3 and sRGB figures. Wide-gamut panels benefit photo editors and video colourists working in HDR workflows.
🏆 Dell U2725QEHDR support differs between these displays: Benq MA270UP (DisplayHDR 400) versus Dell U2725QE (DisplayHDR 600). For HDR movie content and gaming, the higher-tier HDR certification translates to more dynamic highlight detail.
🏆 Dell U2725QEBoth displays use IPS panel technology, so panel-level contrast and viewing angles are comparable. The differences come down to calibration, brightness, and HDR tier. On brightness, Dell U2725QE peaks at 600 nits versus 400 nits — a 50% advantage that matters most in HDR content and brightly lit rooms.
Refresh rate is the headline gaming spec. Dell U2725QE runs at 120Hz versus 60Hz on Benq MA270UP — a 60Hz gap that produces measurably smoother motion in fast-paced games and a lower perceived input lag. VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) eliminates screen tearing by syncing the monitor to your GPU's frame output. Both monitors support adaptive sync: Benq MA270UP with -, and Dell U2725QE with -.
HDR certification differs: Benq MA270UP carries DisplayHDR 400, while Dell U2725QE carries DisplayHDR 600. Higher HDR tiers (HDR600, HDR1000) require greater peak brightness — the number after "HDR" represents the minimum peak nits. For genuine HDR impact in games and streaming, HDR400 is the entry level; HDR600+ is where highlights start to look distinctly brighter than SDR.
Both monitors share similar resolution, so text sharpness is comparable. Ergonomic stand flexibility and screen real estate become the main productivity differentiators.
Both monitors share 4K resolution, but refresh rate targets differ. Pushing Dell U2725QE to 120Hz requires more GPU headroom than 60Hz. Mid-range and budget GPU tiers below reflect the lower 60Hz target; top-tier GPUs unlock the full 120Hz potential.
Dell U2725QE has a stronger connectivity suite. HDMI 2.1 support means it can run a PS5 or Xbox Series X at full 4K 120Hz or 1080p 240Hz without adapters — a key advantage for console gamers. The Benq MA270UP covers the basics but lacks some future-proofing ports.
Both monitors have basic stand adjustment. If you need precise positioning, a VESA-compatible monitor arm is recommended — check the spec table for VESA mount support (typically 75×75mm or 100×100mm).
Use our free screen size comparison tool, PPI calculator, and power consumption calculator to go deeper than spec numbers alone. These display comparison tools help you accurately compare monitors and TVs beyond what a spec table shows — from physical dimensions to real-world electricity costs.
Benq MA270UP vs Dell U2725QE: What Actually Matters
The headline difference is refresh rate: Benq MA270UP runs at 60Hz versus 48Hz on Dell U2725QE. That gap matters most in competitive gaming where consistent frame delivery reduces perceived input lag. For everyday desktop use, movies, and productivity work, both feel comparably fluid.
If we had to pick one for most people, the Dell U2725QE earns the recommendation on overall specification strength and a 4.3/5 composite score. That said, the right answer genuinely depends on your GPU, your use case split between gaming and productivity, and whether you spend time in a bright or dark room.
Strengths Worth Knowing
The Benq MA270UP stands out for ips panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction and hdr support (displayhdr 400) with 400 cd/m² peak — enhanced contrast for hdr media. The main compromise: ips contrast (1200 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing conditions compared to va or oled.
The Dell U2725QE stands out for ips black panel with local dimming — combines ips color accuracy with dramatically deeper blacks and premium displayhdr 600 certification — vivid specular highlights and deep shadow detail. The main compromise: standard panel contrast may disappoint in dark room viewing conditions.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
For gaming, the Benq MA270UP has the edge thanks to its 60Hz refresh rate. Higher refresh rates produce smoother motion and reduce perceived input lag — critical advantages in competitive shooters and action titles. If both share the same Hz, compare response time in the spec table above.
For all-day productivity work — documents, spreadsheets, coding, and content creation — resolution and panel colour accuracy matter most. The Dell U2725QE is the stronger daily driver based on overall specification score. For long hours, also look for a model with flicker-free backlight and low blue-light mode — check the spec table above for those details.
The Dell U2725QE is the stronger all-round choice based on its overall score of 4.3/5. That said, if your priority is specifically competitive gaming at the highest possible refresh rate, see the Quick Answer section at the top of this page for use-case-specific recommendations. The Benq MA270UP is not a bad choice — it simply trails on overall specification weight, which may not reflect the single spec most important to your setup.
IPS (In-Plane Switching) panels are the most common in quality monitors — they offer wide viewing angles and accurate colour reproduction, making them ideal for design work, general use, and brightly lit rooms. VA (Vertical Alignment) panels have a higher native contrast ratio, producing deeper blacks, which benefits dark-room gaming and movie watching. OLED panels work differently: each pixel emits its own light, enabling true blacks, near-infinite contrast, and perfect viewing angles — at the cost of higher price and some burn-in risk with static content.
For non-gaming use — web browsing, documents, video calls — 60Hz to 75Hz is completely adequate and you will not feel the difference from a 144Hz or 240Hz panel. Where higher refresh rates genuinely improve the experience beyond gaming is in cursor smoothness during scrolling and desktop navigation, which some users appreciate. In short: the step from 60Hz to 75Hz has minimal benefit; the step from 60Hz to 144Hz is noticeable but not essential for productivity.
Disclaimer: You can write your own disclaimer from APS Settings -> General -> Disclaimer Note.