Benq EW3290U vs Benq EX3210U
The clearest split between the Benq EW3290U and the Benq EX3210U is refresh rate. Benq EX3210U runs at 144Hz versus 60Hz on the Benq EW3290U. That gap is meaningful in fast-paced games — enemies move more smoothly, tracking feels more responsive, and the transition from 60fps to higher frame rates is clearly visible. For everyday desktop use and productivity, both feel identically fluid.
Buy the Benq EW3290U if you need USB-C (USB-C — single-cable connection for modern laptops).
- IPS — accurate colour and wide 178° viewing angles
- Ergonomics — 110 mm height, pivot — adjustable for any desk setup
- 350 cd/m² — brightness — better visibility in bright office environments
Buy the Benq EX3210U if you need Daisy-chain (DisplayPort MST out — chain multiple monitors from).
- AHVA IPS (AU Optronics) — accurate colour and wide 178° viewing angles
- Ergonomics — 100 mm height — adjustable for any desk setup
Benq EW3290U
- Benq EW3290U -- Refresh Rate: 60Hz (max) -- lower max Hz -- less fluid gameplay
- Benq EW3290U -- Response Time: 5 ms (GtG) -- slower GtG response -- more visible blur in fast scenes
- Benq EW3290U -- Pixel Density: 137 PPI -- lower pixel density -- softer at close viewing distances
- Benq EW3290U -- Display Size: 32-inch -- bigger screen -- more immersive for gaming and media
- 💡 Benq EW3290U: IPS -- wide viewing angles, accurate colour
Benq EX3210U
- Benq EX3210U -- Refresh Rate: 144Hz (max) -- higher max Hz -- smoother motion, competitive advantage
- Benq EX3210U -- Response Time: 2 ms (GtG)1 ms (MPRT) -- faster GtG response -- sharper motion, less ghosting
- Benq EX3210U -- Pixel Density: 140 PPI -- sharper image -- more pixels per inch
- Benq EX3210U -- Display Size: 31.5-inch -- smaller screen
- 💡 Benq EX3210U: IPS -- wide viewing angles, accurate colour
- IPS panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction
- HDR support (DisplayHDR 400 / HDR10) with 400 cd/m² peak — enhanced contrast for HDR media
- 4K UHD resolution at 137 PPI — razor-sharp detail for creative and professional workflows
- 98% DCI-P3 — professional-level wide-gamut color reproduction for accurate creative work
- Full ergonomic stand (height, pivot, swivel, tilt) — adaptable for comfortable long-session productivity use
- IPS contrast (1000 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing conditions compared to VA or OLED
- No Thunderbolt 4 — USB-C available but lacks high-speed 40 Gbps bandwidth and high-watt charging
- Entry-tier DisplayHDR 400 — limited local dimming means HDR uplift is modest rather than dramatic
- No built-in Ethernet — monitor lacks wired network hub functionality
- No DisplayPort — HDMI-only video input limits resolution/refresh on older GPU setups
- IPS panel — consistent 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, uniform color reproduction
- 600 cd/m² peak brightness with HDR — punchy highlights well above typical SDR monitors
- 4K UHD resolution at 140 PPI — exceptional detail for design, photo, and professional creative work
- 144Hz refresh rate — noticeably more fluid and responsive than standard 60/75Hz monitors
- 1 ms (MPRT) — significantly sharper moving images with reduced perceived motion blur
- IPS contrast (1000 : 1) — blacks appear grey in dark environments compared to VA or OLED panels
- No USB-C or Thunderbolt — single-cable connectivity with modern laptops requires a separate adapter
- No built-in Ethernet — monitor lacks wired network hub; separate dongle or switch required
- IPS glow in dark corners — common panel characteristic visible during dark scenes on black backgrounds
- BenQ OSD navigation can be complex to configure initially — custom profiles take time to set up
Benq EX3210U at 144Hz versus 60Hz -- 84Hz more smoothness for fast-paced games. Gaming-ready.
🏆 Benq EX3210UBoth displays share 4K resolution at 137 PPI. Text sharpness and screen real estate are equivalent -- consider connectivity (USB-C, KVM) and stand ergonomics for your workspace.
🏆 Benq EW3290UColour accuracy depends on gamut coverage -- see the specification table for DCI-P3 and sRGB figures. Wide-gamut panels benefit photo editors and video colourists working in HDR workflows. Neither includes a factory calibration cert — colour-critical work may require professional calibration post-purchase.
🏆 Benq EW3290UHDR support differs: Benq EX3210U (HDR10 DisplayHDR 600) versus DisplayHDR 400 HDR10. For HDR movie content and gaming, the higher-tier HDR certification translates to more dynamic highlight detail.
🏆 Benq EX3210U| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 7.6/10★★★★★ |
7.8/10★★★★★ |
| Brand | Benq | Benq |
| Category | Monitor | Monitor |
| Basic Information | ||
| Brand | BenQ | BenQ |
| Model | EW3290U | EX3210U |
| Series | MOBIUZ | MOBIUZ |
| Model Alias | - | MOBIUZ EX3210U |
| Model Year | 2024 | 2021 |
| Display | ||
| Size Class | 32-inch | 31.5-inch |
| Panel Type ? | IPS | AHVA IPS (AU Optronics) |
| Curvature | -- | -- |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Pixel Density | 137 PPI | 140 PPI |
| Pixel Pitch | 0.182 mm (millimeters) | 0.182 mm (millimeters) |
| Display Area | 89.02 % (percent) | 85.08 % (percent) |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Color Depth | 10 bits | 10 bits |
| Colors | 1073741824 colors | 1073741824 colors |
| sRGB | - | - |
| DCI-P3 Coverage | 98% | 98% |
| HDR Support ? | DisplayHDR 400 HDR10 |
HDR10 DisplayHDR 600 |
| Brightness & Contrast | ||
| Brightness (Typical) | 350 cd/m² | - |
| Peak Brightness | 400 cd/m² | 600 cd/m² |
| Contrast | 1000 : 1 | 1000 : 1 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz (hertz) | 48 Hz - 144 Hz |
| Response Time | 5 ms (GtG) | 2 ms (GtG)1 ms (MPRT) |
| Adaptive Sync ? | - | AMD FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Display Technologies | ||
| Advanced Display Technologies | Panel Technology: - Backlight: W-LED Viewing Angles: 178° / 178° (H / V) MPRT Response: - Dynamic Contrast: - Input Lag: - Screen Coating: Anti-glare/Matte |
Panel Technology: - Backlight: W-LED Viewing Angles: 178° / 178° (H / V) MPRT Response: 1 ms (MPRT) Dynamic Contrast: - Input Lag: - Screen Coating: Anti-glare/Matte (3H) |
| Camera | ||
| Camera | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Audio | 2 x 2 W (watts) | 3.5 mm Audio Out | 2 x 2 W (watts) | Sub: 1 x 5 W (watts) | 3.5 mm Audio Out |
| Connectivity & Ports | ||
| Ports | 1 x USB 3.2 (Type-C; Gen 1; 5 Gbps; upstream; 65W; DP Alt Mode) 1 x USB 3.2 (Type-C; Gen 1; 5 Gbps; downstream; 7.5W) 3 x USB 3.2 (Type-A; Gen 1; 5 Gbps; downstream; 7.5W) 3 x HDMI 2.0 1 x 3.5 mm Audio Out High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 2.2 |
1 x USB 3.0 (Type-B; upstream) 4 x USB 3.0 (Type-A; downstream) 2 x HDMI 2.1 1 x DisplayPort 1.4 1 x 3.5 mm Audio Out High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) 2.2 |
| Wireless | - | - |
| Ergonomics | ||
| VESA Mount | 100 x 100 mm | 100 x 100 mm |
| Height Adjustment | 110 mm | 100 mm |
| Pivot | ±0° | No |
| Swivel | ±20° | ±15° |
| Tilt | -5° to +20° | -5° to +15° |
| Removable Stand | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming Features | ||
| Gaming Features | AMA (Advanced Motion Accelerator) | AMA (Advanced Motion Accelerator) AMD FreeSync Premium Pro Black eQualizer Color Vibrance FPS Mode Motion Blur Reduction |
| Smart & Software Features | ||
| Operating System | - | - |
| Smart Features | AI Contrast AI Picture Optimization Technology Brightness Intelligence Plus Gen2 (B.I.+ Gen2) Color Weakness Mode ePaper Flicker-free technology HDRi Low Blue Light Plus |
Brightness Intelligence Plus technology Color Weakness Mode ePaper Flicker-free technology HDRi IR sensor Light Tuner Low Blue Light Quantum Dot Color Scenario Mapping |
| Power Consumption | ||
| Voltage | 100–240V | 100–240V |
| Frequency | 50/60Hz | 50/60Hz |
| Average Consumption | 29W | 48W |
| Maximum Consumption | 180W | 160W |
| Standby | 0.3W | 0.5W |
| Certificates | ||
| Certificates | EPEAT Eyesafe Certified 2.0 TÜV Rheinland Flicker-free Certified TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light Certified (Hardware Solution) |
- |
| Design, Build & Dimensions | ||
| Without Stand Width | 714.5 mm | 726.7 mm |
| Without Stand Height | 443.9 mm | 442.4 mm |
| Without Stand Depth | 67.8 mm | 65.6 mm |
| Without Stand Weight | 6 kg | 6.6 kg |
| With Stand Width | 714.5 mm | 726.7 mm |
| With Stand Height | 483.3 mm | 487.4 mm |
| With Stand Depth | 211.2 mm | 269.9 mm |
| With Stand Weight | 8.1 kg | 9.5 kg |
| Color | White | Dark Grey and Silver |
| Operating Conditions | ||
| Temperature | - | - |
| Humidity | - | - |
Panel technology is the biggest difference here. Benq EW3290U uses IPS, while Benq EX3210U uses IPS. The Benq EW3290U's IPS panel delivers wider 178° viewing angles and more consistent colour accuracy -- ideal for colour-critical work or shared viewing. The Benq EX3210U's VA panel offers a higher native contrast ratio (typically 3000:1+), making dark scenes look deeper in a dim room. On brightness, Benq EX3210U peaks at 600 nits versus 400 nits -- a 50% advantage that matters most in HDR content and brightly lit rooms.
Refresh rate is the headline gaming spec. Benq EX3210U runs at 144Hz versus 60Hz on Benq EW3290U -- a 84Hz gap. 144Hz is the entry point for serious gaming. The Benq EX3210U reaches this threshold; the Benq EW3290U at 60Hz is adequate for casual gaming but not competitive play.On response time: Benq EW3290U (5 ms (GtG)) versus Benq EX3210U (2 ms (GtG)1 ms (MPRT)). VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) eliminates screen tearing by syncing the monitor to your GPU's frame output. Both monitors support adaptive sync: Benq EW3290U with -, and Benq EX3210U with AMD FreeSync Premium Pro.
HDR certification differs: Benq EW3290U carries DisplayHDR 400 HDR10, while Benq EX3210U carries HDR10 DisplayHDR 600. Higher HDR tiers (HDR600, HDR1000) require greater peak brightness -- the number after "HDR" represents the minimum peak nits. For genuine HDR impact in games and streaming, HDR400 is the entry level; HDR600+ is where highlights start to look distinctly brighter than SDR.
Both share 4K resolution, but Benq EX3210U has a marginally higher pixel density (140 vs 137 PPI) -- a small but noticeable difference for fine text at close range. Neither monitor offers full ergonomic adjustment. A VESA monitor arm is recommended for proper positioning if you spend long hours at your desk. For bright office environments, Benq EX3210U at 600 nits versus 400 nits provides better visibility against ambient light -- the higher brightness reduces eye strain in daylit rooms.
Both monitors share 4K resolution, but refresh rate targets differ. Pushing Benq EX3210U to 144Hz requires more GPU headroom than 60Hz. Mid-range and budget GPU tiers below reflect the lower 60Hz target; top-tier GPUs unlock the full 144Hz potential.
Both monitors offer comparable connectivity.
Connectivity score methodology: USB-C Power Delivery (2 pts) · USB hub ports (2 pts) · Ethernet (1 pt) · HDMI 2.1 (1 pt) · KVM switch (2 pts) · Thunderbolt (2 pts). Higher score = more complete connectivity package. Ties broken in favour of USB-C power delivery.
Both monitors have basic stand adjustment. If you need precise positioning, a VESA-compatible monitor arm is recommended -- check the spec table for VESA mount support (typically 75×75mm or 100×100mm).
Use our free screen size comparison tool, PPI calculator, and power consumption calculator to go deeper than spec numbers alone. These display comparison tools help you accurately compare monitors and TVs beyond what a spec table shows -- from physical dimensions to real-world electricity costs.
Bottom line: For most buyers, the Benq EX3210U is the stronger choice, leading on full height and tilt adjustment. The Benq EW3290U is worth considering if cost is the deciding factor or if its specific connectivity or form factor better matches your desk setup. Check the use-case categories above to see which display wins for your primary activity.
Benq EW3290U vs Benq EX3210U: What Actually Matters
The most fundamental difference here is panel technology. The Benq EW3290U uses IPS while the Benq EX3210U uses IPS. In practice that means the VA panel offers superior contrast in dark environments, while the IPS panel provides more consistent colour accuracy and viewing angles for collaborative or well-lit workspaces.
If we had to pick one for most people, the Benq EX3210U earns the recommendation on overall specification strength and a 3.9/5 composite score. That said, the right answer genuinely depends on your GPU, your use case split between gaming and productivity, and whether you spend time in a bright or dark room.
Strengths Worth Knowing
The Benq EW3290U stands out for ips panel — wide 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, consistent color reproduction and hdr support (displayhdr 400 / hdr10) with 400 cd/m² peak — enhanced contrast for hdr media. The main compromise: ips contrast (1000 : 1) — blacks look grey in dark viewing conditions compared to va or oled.
The Benq EX3210U stands out for ips panel — consistent 178°/178° viewing angles with accurate, uniform color reproduction and 600 cd/m² peak brightness with hdr — punchy highlights well above typical sdr monitors. The main compromise: ips contrast (1000 : 1) — blacks appear grey in dark environments compared to va or oled panels.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
For gaming, the Benq EX3210U has the edge thanks to its 144Hz maximum refresh rate. Higher refresh rates produce smoother motion and reduce perceived input lag -- critical advantages in competitive shooters and action titles. If both share the same Hz, compare response time in the spec table above.
Both the Benq EW3290U and Benq EX3210U use IPS -- the differences lie in HDR tier: DisplayHDR 400 HDR10 versus HDR10 DisplayHDR 600. A higher HDR tier means more peak brightness and better highlight rendering on compatible streaming content and games.
For all-day productivity work -- documents, spreadsheets, coding, and content creation -- resolution and panel colour accuracy matter most. The Benq EX3210U is the stronger daily driver based on overall specification score. For long hours, also look for a model with flicker-free backlight and low blue-light mode -- check the spec table above for those details.
The Benq EX3210U is the stronger all-round choice based on its overall score of 3.9/5. That said, if your priority is specifically competitive gaming at the highest possible refresh rate, see the Quick Answer section at the top of this page for use-case-specific recommendations. The Benq EW3290U is not a bad choice -- it simply trails on overall specification weight, which may not reflect the single spec most important to your setup.
IPS (In-Plane Switching) panels are the most common in quality monitors -- they offer wide viewing angles and accurate colour reproduction, making them ideal for design work, general use, and brightly lit rooms. VA (Vertical Alignment) panels have a higher native contrast ratio, producing deeper blacks, which benefits dark-room gaming and movie watching. OLED panels work differently: each pixel emits its own light, enabling true blacks, near-infinite contrast, and perfect viewing angles -- at the cost of higher price and some burn-in risk with static content.
For non-gaming use -- web browsing, documents, video calls -- 60Hz to 75Hz is completely adequate and you will not feel the difference from a 144Hz or 240Hz panel. Where higher refresh rates genuinely improve the experience beyond gaming is in cursor smoothness during scrolling and desktop navigation, which some users appreciate. In short: the step from 60Hz to 75Hz has minimal benefit; the step from 60Hz to 144Hz is noticeable but not essential for productivity.
Disclaimer: You can write your own disclaimer from APS Settings -> General -> Disclaimer Note.